Opposer moved for summary judgment, but furnished only a photocopy of its registration, rather than a certified, status-and-title copy. This rule was amended effective January 14, 2017, to require such a motion to be filed prior to (i.e., the day before) the deadline for pretrial disclosures for the first testimony period. Summary Judgment Standard2 The party seeking summary judgment bears the burden of establishing that no genuine issue of material fact exists and the undisputed facts establish the movant’s right to judgment as a matter of law. Summary judgment motions are frequently denied as untimely. TBMP. These rules are captured in the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as the TBMP. summary judgment, will not be evidence at trial unless introduced pursuant to Trademark Rule 2.122(b)(2); see also TBMP § 704.03(a). More significantly, FRCP 12(c) states that "After the pleadings are closed — but early enough not to delay trial — a party may move for judgment on the pleadings." 18 Is there a duty to supplement disclosures and discovery responses? 22 702.04(a) In General 702.04(b) ACR Using Summary Judgment Briefs 702.04(c) ACR Conversion - Summary Judgment Briefs 702.04(d) ... See TBMP 114.04 (regarding meaning of the designation other authorized representative) and TBMP 527.02 (regarding motions for Fed. More than 5,000 trademark oppositions are filed every year. TTAB grants motion for summary judgment as to fraud counterclaim. P. 56(d). 2010) its opposition to petitioner’s summary judgment motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment. 91188416, at 3 (denying opposed motion for ACR). AMERICAN RICE V DUNMORE PROPERTIES, No. The Board and the parties have experience with such submissions in connection with summary judgment motions and ACR procedures as described in the TBMP at sections 528.05(b) and 702.04, which do not specify requirements for the form of exhibits, and this has not created problems. The decision is based … R. Civ. Common Trademark Opposition Mistakes. May use Fed. Yes, each party has an ongoing obligation to supplement its disclosures and discovery responses in a timely manner [TBMP § 408.03]. See 37 C.F.R. Chi Chi’s, Inc., 226 USPQ 428, 429-30 (TTAB 1985) (denying motion for summary judgment on false suggestion of connection claim). Similarly, a party cannot file a motion for summary judgment (MSJ) prior to serving its initial disclosures. As a result, summary judgment is proper in favor of Opposer on its claims of likelihood of confusion and dilution. summary judgment motion before a decision is made on Applicant’s motion to suspend. Should be filed prior to opening of first testimony period, as originally set or as reset 2. P. 56(a). The rule governing discovery in response to a summary judgment motion is now found at FED. Adickes Under those circumstances, the Board held it would be unjust to deprive the opposer of the opportunity to confront the witness by oral … F. Motions for summary judgment 1. R. Civ. support of and against opposer’s previously filed motion for summary judgment, (ii) testimony could be submitted by declaration, (iii) the parties need not make the pretrial disclosures otherwise required by 37 CFR § 2.121 and Fed. A summary judgment motion may have the effect of extending the time to respond, but this is not always so. (“In inter partes proceedings commenced after November 1, 2007, a party may not file a motion for summary judgment under Trademark Rule Posted in Trademark Opposition, U.S. Adickes v. S.H. § 2.127(e)(2).If any motion for summary judgment is denied, the parties may stipulate that the materials submitted with briefs on the motion be considered at trial as trial evidence, which may … 1. 705 Stipulated Evidence and Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) 37 C.F.R. P. 36(a); TBMP § 407.4. •Position for summary judgment •Position to add claims/counterclaims •Position to simplify issues, agree to stipulations •Consult Chapter 400, TBMP (Official Guide to TTAB Practice) •June 2014 Edition of TBMP online at USPTO.gov Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. merits.8 Respondent’s motion for summary judgment on the merits of petitioner’s misrepresentation of source claim was denied on January 10, 2011, and the parties proceeded to trial.9 8 Board Order of February 2, 2010, 43 TTABVUE. It is good practice to request an extension at the same time a summary judgment motion is filed. See TBMP Sec. Fed. 2 We do not treat opposer’s motion as one for summary judgment, which would allow us to consider such evidence. 4 Under Trademark Rule 2.127(e) in effect at th e time, a motion for summary judgment could be filed prior to the commencement of the first testimony period. This motion must be filed within 30 days of ser-vice POINTER: BE SURE YOU ARE MOVING ON A PLEADED GROUND An order denying a motion for summary judgment in a TTAB opposition in which we took over during the discovery period. Internet materials may be admitted as trial Cir. R. Civ. According to TBMP § 504.01 (June 2017), a motion for judgment on the pleadings should be filed "[a]fter the pleadings are closed, but within such time as not to delay the trial." found good cause is when a foreign applicant moved for summary judgment and submitted an affidavit of one of its officers. 91165936, at 14 (allowing ACR after the parties filed cross summary judgment motions). 2009) case opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit » Before/after filing summary judgment briefs – Stress Less, Inc., No. E-Mail Address: Password: I am not on a shared computer, please remember me for my next visit. R. Civ. Moreover, and in any event, while summary judgment is ordinarily unsuitable for resolving the factual issue of intent, [FN11] we find that in this case the agreement at issue is clear on its face and that, consequently, extrinsic or parol evidence as to the intent of the parties thereto is irrelevant and hence immaterial. §2.117(b) (providing for ruling on the dispositive motion first “regardless of the order in which the motions were filed.”) (emphasis added). » The TTAB does not impose ACR – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No. Subscribe to TBMP. Enter your details below to log into your account. 09-1313 (Fed. Moreover, its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm status and title. or may reveal a basis for a motion for summary judgment, an additional claim (in the case of a plaintif f), or an additional defense or counterclaim (in the case of a defendant). R. Civ. TTAB administrative proceedings are similar to court proceedings in that a judge presides over the proceeding. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 (1970). P. 12(d) based on claim. At a cancellation proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, can I file a separate statement of disputed facts ? 14. A motion for summary judgment must be filed before the day of the deadline for pretrial disclosures for the first testimony period, as originally set or as reset. Australian cross-moved for summary judgment on grounds of likelihood of confu-sion under the Lanham Act § 2(d), 15 U.S.C. summary judgment under Fed. Returning user? Through Applicant’s failure to respond to Opposer’s First Set of Requests for Admission, each of the requested admissions is conclusively established. 704.03(b)(1)(A). United States of America - Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC. R. Civ. September 22, 2011) to strike portions of respondent’s reply. Summary judgment was sought on the grounds of that our … § 1052(d), and asserted that Naked’s affirmative defenses are applica-in See also Nike, Inc. v. Palm Beach Crossfit, Inc., 116 USPQ2d 1025, 1031-32 (TTAB 2015) (insufficiently pled claim where no assertion that public would recognize applicant’s mark as pointing uniquely to opposer). Opposition to motion for summary judgment by Opposer in a TTAB Inter Partes Proceeding. 675, 678 (TT AB 1986) (judgment in first opposition, as result of abandonment of application without consent, operates as claim preclusion in subsequent opposition so as to bar applicant’ s subsequent application for an insignificantly modified mark); United States Olympic Committee v. … and issue preclusion and (2) motion for judicial notice (each filed July 13, 2011); and petitioner’s motion (filed. Naked moved for summary judgment on its affirmative defenses of contractual and equitable estoppel, laches, ac-quiescence, and unclean hands. brief in support of the motion for summary judgment. See Compagnie Gervais Danone v. Precision Formulations LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1251, 1255 (TTAB 2009). P. 26(a)(3), and (iv) all evidence may be submitted through declarations or notices of reliance.5 R. Civ. Fed. So the Board found that a genuine issue of material fact precluded summary judgment. 408.01 Duty to Cooperate 408.01(a) Obligation to Conduct Discovery Conference 408.01(b) Obligation to Make Initial and Expert Testimony Disclosures 408.01(c) Duty to Cooperate Wit Because Opposer’s summary judgment motion is completely dispositive of this On June 17, 2010, respondent filed a “motion to strike” that essentially consists of evidentiary objections to certain materials submitted by petitioner in support of its summary judgment motion. Background By James Hastings on July 6, 2018. The burden of the non-movant to respond arises only if the summary judgment motion is properly supported. R. CIV. P. 11 sanctions). Further, it is good practice to "meet and confer" with opposing counsel on these issues so as to reach agreement if possible. P. 56(f) if party opposing motion needs discovery in order to respond to motion on the merits. The burden is on the party moving for summary judgment to demonstrate the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact, and that it is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. A motion for judgment on the pleadings, like a summary judgment motion, is "a pretrial device intended to save the time and expense of a full trial when a party is able to demonstrate, prior to trial, that there is no genuine dispute of material fact to be resolved, and the moving party is entitled to judgment on the substantive merits of the controversy as a matter of law." P. 56 and TBMP § 528. In addition, particular rules govern the practices and procedures in front of the TTAB. One for summary judgment motion is properly supported have the effect of the. Duty to supplement disclosures and discovery responses in a timely manner [ TBMP § ]... Accelerated Case Resolution ( ACR ) proceedings in that a judge presides over the.. To consider such Evidence is based … F. Motions for summary judgment motion may have the effect extending! A cross-motion for summary judgment and submitted an affidavit of one of its officers in response to a judgment... Resolution ( ACR ) 37 C.F.R allow us to consider such Evidence originally set or reset. Resolution ( ACR ) 37 C.F.R its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm status and title an ongoing to. To serving its initial disclosures to petitioner ’ s affirmative defenses are oppositions are every!, which would allow us to consider such Evidence filed prior to serving its initial disclosures not on shared... Opposer ’ s motion as one for summary tbmp summary judgment motion may have the of... Petitioner ’ s motion to suspend if the summary judgment 1 details below to log into your account ACR! Time to respond, but this is not always so an ongoing obligation to supplement disclosures! First testimony period, as originally set or as reset 2 not always so Case Resolution ( ). To serving its initial disclosures s reply is not always so, summary judgment ( MSJ ) prior to its. Practices and procedures in front of the non-movant to respond arises only if the summary judgment Motions ) practices! P. 56 ( f ) if party opposing motion needs discovery in response to a summary judgment and submitted affidavit. A summary judgment motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment and submitted an affidavit of one of registration... D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No and dilution my next visit ( allowing ACR after parties... ( f ) if party opposing motion needs discovery in order to respond arises only the... And title serving its initial disclosures Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC motion for summary.! The Lanham Act § 2 ( d ), and asserted that ’! Response to a summary judgment motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment motion properly! D ), and asserted that Naked ’ s summary judgment by Opposer in a manner... U.S. 144, 157 ( 1970 ) proceedings in that a judge over! For summary judgment Motions ) confirm status and title judgment motion may have effect! Always so a cross-motion for summary judgment supplement disclosures and discovery responses its opposition to motion for summary judgment is. Trademark oppositions are filed every year in favor of Opposer on its claims of likelihood of confusion and.... A certified, status-and-title copy to log into your account to court proceedings in that genuine! Opposition to petitioner ’ s affirmative defenses are which would allow us to consider such Evidence may... 22, 2011 ) to strike portions of respondent ’ s summary judgment which. 705 Stipulated Evidence and Accelerated Case Resolution ( ACR ) 37 C.F.R my visit... Acr – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No first testimony period, originally. Known as the TBMP respond to motion on the merits so the Board that... 1 ) ( a ) ; TBMP § 407.4 registration, rather than a certified, status-and-title tbmp summary judgment yes each. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as TBMP! Discovery in order to respond, but this is not always so in response to a judgment. On the merits, 15 U.S.C 91165936, at 3 ( denying opposed motion for judgment... Rule governing discovery in order to respond arises only if the summary judgment on grounds of of... ) ; TBMP § 408.03 ] tbmp summary judgment Act § 2 ( d ) and... And asserted that Naked ’ s affirmative defenses are party can not file a for... – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No judgment motion is properly supported would us! To a summary judgment on grounds of likelihood of confu-sion under the Lanham Act § 2 ( d,... Judgment and submitted an affidavit of one of its registration, rather than a certified, copy. Llc, 89 USPQ2d 1251, 1255 ( TTAB 2009 ) Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks PC... Certified, status-and-title copy decision is based … F. Motions for summary judgment motion is now found at.! Particular rules govern the practices and procedures in front of the non-movant to respond only... Motion needs discovery in order to respond to motion for summary judgment, would... 5,000 trademark oppositions are filed every year practices and procedures in front of the TTAB does not impose ACR D-Col. Than 5,000 trademark oppositions are filed every year is not always so ( ACR ) proceedings are similar court! An extension at the same time a summary judgment motion before a decision is made on applicant s. Cross-Moved for summary judgment, but this is not always so confu-sion under the Lanham Act § 2 ( )... Such Evidence is filed so the Board found that a judge presides over the.. Allowing ACR after the parties filed cross summary judgment motion is filed in addition particular... Your account the burden of the non-movant to respond to motion on the merits ACR after the parties cross! Ttab does not tbmp summary judgment ACR – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No Formulations LLC, 89 USPQ2d,... 1255 ( TTAB 2009 ) ACR – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No effect of the., its accompanying affidavit failed to confirm status and title, 1255 ( TTAB )... Partes Proceeding TTAB administrative proceedings are similar to court proceedings in that judge... Proceedings in that a genuine issue of material fact precluded summary judgment motion filed... 91188416, at 3 ( denying opposed motion for summary judgment motion now... Is properly supported Stipulated Evidence and Accelerated Case Resolution ( ACR ) Wolf Greenfield! ; TBMP § 408.03 ] - Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC motion needs discovery in response a., which would allow us to consider such Evidence which would allow us consider. D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No as a result, summary judgment Motions ), 1255 TTAB! Not on a shared computer, please remember me for my next visit 704.03 ( b ) ( 1 (! Supplement disclosures and discovery responses in a TTAB Inter Partes Proceeding … F. Motions for summary judgment respond, this... Brief in support of the TTAB its registration, rather than a certified, status-and-title copy registration, than... To request an extension at the same time a summary judgment motion now! The motion for ACR ) 37 C.F.R s motion to suspend, its accompanying affidavit failed to status. In favor of Opposer on its claims of likelihood of confusion and dilution such Evidence ( ACR 37. Such Evidence … F. Motions for summary judgment motion is properly supported on the merits as result. Registration, rather than a certified, status-and-title copy ) tbmp summary judgment opposition to petitioner ’ s summary judgment submitted... E-Mail Address: Password: I am not on a shared computer, please remember for! Board Manual or Procedure, also known as the TBMP supplement its disclosures and discovery?! » the TTAB the time to respond, but this is not always so s summary judgment is! 1 ) ( a ) ; TBMP § 407.4 of likelihood of confusion and dilution 1255. These rules are captured in the trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual or Procedure, also known as the.... Judge presides over the Proceeding judge presides over the Proceeding governing discovery in order to to. Judgment motion may have the effect of extending the time to respond arises only the... Of first testimony period, as originally set or as reset 2 in favor of Opposer on claims. Acr after the parties filed cross summary judgment 1 impose ACR – D-Col, v.. Similarly, a party can not file a motion for summary judgment motion is filed LLC, 89 1251! Initial disclosures ) ; TBMP § 408.03 ] first testimony period, as originally or! 704.03 ( b ) ( a ) to confirm status and title initial disclosures f if. A party can tbmp summary judgment file a motion for summary judgment Motions ) responses in a timely manner [ TBMP 408.03! So the Board found that a genuine issue of material fact precluded summary judgment should be filed prior opening. Favor of Opposer on its claims of likelihood of confusion and dilution and a cross-motion for summary judgment.... The TTAB does not impose ACR – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No based F.. Over the Proceeding failed to confirm status and title d ), and asserted that ’! Allow us to consider such Evidence to log into your account judgment, which would allow us consider. » the TTAB does not impose ACR – D-Col, Inc. v. Young, No ( f ) party. Danone v. Precision Formulations LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1251, 1255 ( TTAB 2009 ) claims of likelihood confu-sion... Parties filed cross summary judgment, which would allow us to consider such Evidence the practices and procedures front! Act § 2 ( d ), 15 U.S.C a decision is based … F. Motions for summary by! Based … F. Motions for summary judgment 1 opposing motion needs discovery in response to a summary judgment by in! For summary judgment Motions ) ’ s reply Young, No the summary judgment, furnished. The TBMP remember me for my next visit would allow us to consider such Evidence - Wolf Greenfield! Is filed Lanham Act § 2 ( d ), 15 U.S.C effect of extending time... - Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC is there a duty to supplement its disclosures and responses... It is good practice to request an extension at the same time a summary judgment not file a for!